Friday 7 October 2016

11 Design considerations 4 - benchwork

In this post I want to talk about design considerations that are influenced by benchwork.



Design considerations as influenced by - benchwork

Due to the fact that the proposed home layout will be located in the second bedroom of my appartment and the fact that there are no build in storage closets as well as the fact that in the past years things got seriously messy as far as storing things go, the room has to do double duty as storage room.

That means that benchwork has to be build in such a way that it is possible to do so. Various ways are possible here. However, the need for storage coupled to a lack of woodworking skills and no real interest in acquiring them, lead me to choose the Ikea Ivar storage system as the preferred choice for sub benchwork. The 'real' benchwork will be on top of the planks and because of that can be lighter as it has to support less weight.




Long ago German modeller Rolf Knipper came up with the idea of using an Ikea Ivar system and he described it in MIBA Spezial 73 from july 2007.

Building everything in segments and have some of those segments conform to the module standards of my Fremo group americaN makes it relatively easy to transport them. I plan to build at least Albia in such a way that it can be set up, with extra segments having a standard endplate, as an americaN module.
The Fremo americaN norm can be found here:
- general introduction introduction page in English (note most pages are in German)
- standard and recommendations as well as documents pertaining to the mode of operation of our modular model railroad

Lately a group of America-N modellers have caught the lets model modern industrial parks bug and they came up a with a module standard they call Shelf-and-Tabletop or American ST. More info, in German, can be found here:

I particularly like the lower height for the modules. Less height means less weight when I want to bring a module to a meeting. Since I don't have a driver's license I have to drag the modules around on public transport. That's not a big problem as long as you keep things lightweight and relatively small. The lighter I can make the modules, the easier that becomes. The trick is doing it without sacrificing strength while also protecting the vulnerable scenery on top. I think ST managed to come up with a good working system that can also be employed at home. I particularly think about all the stretches of track outside points of interest when I want to apply this system to my home layout.

Marc and Claus show on their blogs what is possible with the system. Peter and Elmar are also doing fantastic work but don't have a blog. Michael has traditionally documented our meets and you can see some of Elmar's work here under Florida branch. And more American ST modules here.

Additional advantage of modelling in segments that can also be used as modules is that you can do all the dirty work with water, gypsum, glue etcetera in a place that is better equipped for such things. I my case that would generally be the balcony as it is rather big at 4,5 by 5 meters.

To recapitulate: segments build ST style (but with separate backdrops most likely) that can be, where necessary, extended with extra segments to conform to the Fremo America-N standard and they rest on top / in an Ikea Ivar storage system that will do double duty with general storage below the model railroad.


Saturday 30 April 2016

10 Design considerations 3 - available space

Health and computer problems kept me away but now that I have a new laptop and some money left it is time to get back to this blog and designing a home layout.

In this post I want to talk about design considerations that are influenced by available space.


Design considerations as influenced by - available space

Big dreams need a big space. Mine is only 205 cm by 360 cm ...
That seems long enough but the width looks on the narrow side. One way to deal with this is to build a second fully scenicked deck. It isn't possible to build a peninsula down the middle with a big turnback blob by which I could gain height to get from one deck to another and a helix will eat up a lot of floor space too. Not to mention block the movement of people and air as well as narrowing the view in an already narrow room. I would really like to keep an aisle width of 1 meter so movement of people and air is not restricted. So how is the model railroad going to gain height?

Going around the room to gain heigth to move to another scenicked deck takes a lot of meters if you want a grade that isn't too steep. There doesn't seem enough length in the room for a corkscrew or nolix (no helix) around the room unless you go twice through the same scene. Not really acceptable. Doing it with a lot of hidden trackage (behind the backdrop) also isn't acceptable as that creates access problems. In Model Railroad Planning 2003 Gary Saxton described his New York, Ontario and Western layout featuring 7 levels in a dining room. For my taste the decks are too close together at 7.5 inches and the second time the train goes around a deck it is 4 inch higher thus closer to the underside of the deck above. As a consequence the sky is then limited. But if you dream big you sometimes are forced to go to extremes. 

One way to gain height is virtually. In this design you do not actually connect the decks with track but either by imagining the connection or manually move locomotives and cars between decks. It is, so to speak, the poor woman's method. Byron Henderson had a proposal in Model Railroad Planning many years ago with the railroads of Hawai as inspiration.

Another big consideration is the room itself. It is finished but comes with restraints. One long wall is a load bearing concrete wall. DENSE concrete as I was warned by the previous owner and the man who installed a new kitchen. As my downstairs neighbour has been finding out as he renovates his appartment one room at a time. The other long wall is made of blocks of sand and quicklime or burned lime pressed together. A common source for building interior walls here in the Netherlands. It is thin however (this is in keeping with the fact that my house is an entry level cheap house) and I have the feeling with these limesandstone blocks that if you point a drill at it that it crumbles spontaneously. 

Then there is the door to the room. Of course it swings inward. Do they ever swing outward? It has a steel frame so it is not easy turning the frame around so the door swings outward. Exchanging it with another door in the apartment is difficult too. Multiple decks means operating trains with a closed door and a number of planks or bridges across the door. Or removing the door so in case of danger one can escape quicker. I'm pretty certain the latter will happen eventually. The door is located almost in the middle of the short wall and that leaves enough room for the chosen benchwork on both sides. Phew.

The window is pretty big, as most windows are in the Netherlands. At least it is east facing so not a lot of heat gets into the room though there is a flat roof above it. Unlike the master bedroom next door which has walls facing east, south and west and the aforementioned flat roof...

So the space is not ideal (is it ever when it comes to repurposing a room for a modelrailroad?) but workable. It has to be. Because of its limitations some inventive thinking is needed. What at first seemed simple, an along the walls type of plan, may end up more complex with 2 or more levels, a train elevator and lately I've been thinking about a partially freestanding layout. With helixes no less ... 


To be continued.

Thursday 25 February 2016

9 Design considerations 2 - skill and energy & willpower

In this post I want to talk about design considerations that are influenced by skill as well as energy and willpower.




Design considerations as influenced by - skills

Do you have the necessary skills to build a home layout? And maintain it too? I was well on my way to become an avid module builder when my health crashed. I haven't been able to even repair the problem areas of the modules that had made it to Fremo meetings in a bare state or reconstruct them. Let alone scenic them. But meanwhile I still have what's commonly referred to here in the Netherlands as two left hands. Or to put it bluntly, DIY skills need some serious improvement. The only thing I'm good at is painting walls and windows. I don't like woodwork and after building a couple of modules from scratch myself and now like to buy kits for my modules made from custom lasered lightweight plywood. I'm not very good with a soldering iron either. Which I found out after a particular bumpy ride over sidewalks for my modules when I transported them to a Fremo meeting. The trains don't run when there is no electricity flowing to the rails...

This is not insurmountable as it mostly consists of doing it and doing it again but better. It's the getting of my behind that is a big problem right now. Luckily motivation has increased considerably so that helps.



Design considerations as influenced by - energy and willpower

If one thing has been made clear to me in the past few of years it is the fact that I no longer have the raw amount of energy to smash through anything that stands in my way. Nor do I have the willpower to do so (and other things) anymore. Can I sustain enough interest in building a home layout and see it through to a stage that I can run trains? Will my still relatively scarce energy be completely eaten by going back to work and survive a work environment as the person I am? Will my lack of DIY skills mean it takes me longer to get to the point where I can run trains in a bare landscape?

Not biting off more than I can chew is therefore paramount. Designing the modelrailroad I want in phases seems the way to go. First phase has to have a continuous run option for those days when (almost) nothing goes and I just want to watch trains go in circles as a form of therapy.

Monday 22 February 2016

8 Design considerations 1 - time and money

Time, money and space are 3 of the things you have to consider when you start the design of a model railroad. At times all three were lacking but currently it is mainly money that is lacking besides energy. The latter is a long term matter I can only patiently work at. Once it gets better in that department then money will become more freely available again as it means I can work. That, however, is not yet the case. 

In this post I want to talk about design considerations that are influenced by time and money.




Design considerations as influenced by - time

You can dream about wanting a big layout all you want but if you don't have time to build it do you have the money to buy it from a professional builder? Right now I have the time and the space but not the money or the energy. Energy will hopefully improve a lot in the coming year but if it does then I will also get back to work and hopefully full time again. That means a lot less time for activities like model railroading considering that full time means 36-40 hours PLUS travel time. The last time I worked it was 40 hours a week plus 20-30 hours of travel time to wherever my job took me that day. It also took me to a burnout as I had been ignoring a persistent problem. I don't know if I would have ended up in the same place if I hadn't ignored that problem for so long.

Another way of looking at time is that over time things change including the things that interest you. Back in 2008 I enthousiastically dove into the world of Fremo americaN, modular railroading in N scale following North American prototypes. By 2010 I had build a number of modules but for some reason or another they failed. Including on technical grounds due to problems while transporting them to the 2010 Fremo Autumn meeting in Zuidbroek here in the Netherlands. My skills were not equal to acorns on a bicycle path and small blocks used as pavement for sidewalks. Maybe if I had been given time I could have repaired it and that could have made a positive contribution to my life which was going  down the drain very fast at that point in time as it turned out. Now my interests have changed to the point that I no longer want to build modules whose theme is invented but I do want to build modules that follow a specific prototype. 





Design considerations as influenced by - money

Do you, or rather I, have the money to chase the dream of building a home layout? It ties up a lot of money, some of it (like my chosen mode of benchwork) up front. Much more so than modules do. And independent of the fact if you build, in the end, only one level or multiple levels. Right now money is still scarce. It will get better in a few months but I must still limit myself. Can I maintain momentum? This has proven to be difficult in the past.

Then again, the more money you have the more things you tend to buy. Even things that don't fit into the choosen theme. More levels do tend to lead to more locomotives and cars and you need to send them someplace which then needs to be bigger too. Which was the reason in the first place to finally get going with modules. 


In the restraint the master is revealed. 

I don't necessarily want a large layout, just one that satisfies my needs and that can be completed in a reasonable amount of time, energy and not too much money. Restrictions with regard to theme can definitely help here yet every time I get a grip on this I also get back to dreaming. Something I'm very good at...

And round and round we spin, with feet of lead and wings of tin... 

Thursday 11 February 2016

7 The bridges of Mahaska and Monroe counties

I'm finding more and more interesting stuff to include on the layout. A couple of weeks ago I surfed to bridgehunter and saw some quite interesting information about bridges on the line (Scroll to the bottom of page 1). 


That led to a slight reevaluation of what to include. There are enough bridges over Muchakinock Creek in Mahaska county and Miller Creek and its tributaries in Monroe county in the 23 miles between Oskaloosa and Albia that at least some must be included. They can serve as mini scenes as well as scene breakers since I plan on having discrete scenes and the scenery will not be continous. This latter as a result of wanting to include the interchanges with the Wabash, CBQ and CRI&P in a functional way with the tracks in the right place versus the M&StL tracks. This means I have to come up with some off scene way to get the other railroads back to the right side of the M&StL tracks. Black boxes might help here and strategically placed scenery will help.

Look at the placement of the trees at this Pratt through truss bridge over Muchakinnock Creek (go to photos 5 and 6 or 23 and 31) for instance. The location is north of Givin, south of Beacon in Mahaska county, near Kent Avenue and 290th Street.

This link take you to google maps and a photo by John Marvig of the bridge looking north in the direction of Beacon / Oskaloosa. Most likely the view of this part of the modelrailroad would be from the east or right of the picture.

In the same vein, Eddyville has moved up in the list of priorities. Originally I didn't want to include it despite having a long passing siding and a double ended freight spur. It also was the only passing place in later years, after online coal traffic had almost completely dried up. But the discovery of the sand and gravel operations and its scale have led to a reevalution. The interchange with the CRI&P was also a bonus though it might be more difficult to include. But originally I only wanted the bridge over the Des Moines river, more specifically the first half of a through truss span from each end, as a prop to change levels.

This is a small bridge on the south end (Bridgeport side) of the Des Moines River crossing. The crossing consists of this bridge, a plate girder bridge, a long dam (I believe it was originally a pile trestle) and the long bridge consisting of 7 Pratt through trusses spanning both the Des Moines river and Muchakinnock creek. Pictures taken from Bing maps.





And finally just one reference to one of many crossings of Miller Creek.
Note the relative light construction of all the truss bridges. I believe the M&StL's Mikado 2-8-2 steam engines were not allowed on this line. I'm not aware of restrictions on the diesel locomotives though.

Thursday 4 February 2016

6 Resources

Here is a list of resources for modelling the M&StL. I will periodically update this. Particularly with articles and blogs.




Books:

- Gene Green, Minneapolis & St Louis in color, Morning Sun Books
Don L Hofsommer, The Hook & Eye, A history of the Iowa Central
- Don L Hofsommer, The Tootin' Louie
Don L Hofsommer,  The Minneapolis & Saint Louis, a photographic history
Don L Hofsommer,  Minneapolis and the age of railways
- Dennis Holmes, Depots on the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway, CNWHS




Online:

- M&StL Yahoo group 
The group has quite a bit of information available. In the past a number of CD-ROMs were produced with much information from the collections of members as well as hard to get information from resources such as defunct magazines etc.

CNW Historical Society 
This organisation puts out a quarterly magazine and also produces a free online magazine for modelling the CNW and predecessors. It has a good amount of M&StL coverage. The society is also the custodian of a lot of archival material, specifically socalled AFE's or Authority For Expenditure. It encompasses the period 1-1-1912 to 31-12-1956. For much of this period the M&StL was in recievership and needed approval from the bankruptcy judge for every capital expenditure. Basically the whole decisionmaking proces is preserved. Contains lots of drawings, including that of stations and yards.



Photo sites:

Railroad pictures archives
Railpictures 
John Barriger John W Barriger III from 1944-1941 worked in federal service as the railroad chief of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. The RFC was a government organisation tasked with financial support to state and local goverments and made loans to bank, railroads, mortgage associations and other businesses. In this capacity he made 2 trips over the M&StL and either he or an assistant took photos during the trip. His archive is in the St Louis Mercantile Library.
John P. Vander Maas railroadiana collection contains photos of M&StL depots. 
Sam Cook has a number of photos online




Other resources:

- county plat maps showing who owns what land. Often the old ones have a mention of land owned by coal companies. 1930 plat book Monroe county Iowa


Troy township Monroe county. Note railways not always accurately labelled.

Interstate Commerce Commission archives at the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington DC. The ICC held a survey of the railroads in the years after the temporary takeover during and immediately after Worls War 1 in preparation of a permanent takeover of the railroads by the US government. Many maps, drawings and sketches were prepared and they contain a wealth of data.



Tuesday 2 February 2016

5 Switching in a small yard - America-N module Yard Extension - MP 324.6 Albia

Bernd from Fremo AmericaN uploaded a video of switching on a small modulae layout. It has the feeling of what I want to accomplish with a model of Albia as Albia has about the same number of tracks.




Abia had 2 mainlines, one on each side of the depot. On one side there was a double ended track serving a freight house. A team track was nearby. On the other side were a siding and 3 yard tracks. As well as some freight customers and tracks and turntable used for servicing and turning the locomotives ad gas electric motorcars.


M&StL AFE 21-99 CNWHS collection
Albia should fit on a standard width AmericaN module, which is 40 cm wide at the endplates. It will also fit inside the 50 cm deep Ikea Ivar system I would like to use for my home layout. It has 43 cm between the vertical parts of the legs.

Friday 29 January 2016

4 Design considerations as influenced by

The design of any model railroad is influenced by a number of things. The most commonly named in the model railroad press are time, space and money. For me skills as well as energy and willpower are equally important as the first three named. There are also others to take into account.

Design consideration may be constrained by:

- time
- money
- skills
- energy and wilpower
- space
- benchwork
- chosen prototype and period
- yard location
- type of operation
- chosen scale

Some design considerations may be more important than others and during the design process it can change as well.

Case in point: my woodworking skills are not great so I opted to go with an Ikea Ivar storage system as my basic benchwork on which modules and segments will rest. However, I'm having problems locating Oskaloosa's South Yard and in particularly the wye at the south end. It's a very big element and doesn't fit into the Ivar directly so I might have to scale back on the way I want to operate the layout. I'm confident I'll find a solution so I can include a functioning wye and with it the operational benefits of including the beginning of the 11 district and the through freights I can then operate. This in contrast to not making the wye functional and then having all freight cars come from North Yard / staging in the shape of transfers. There is drama missing there and what attracted me to the M&StL in the first place where picture of through freights passing the passenger station. I might have to become good enough at woodworking or find another way to include this important part (to me) of the railroad.

Sunday 17 January 2016

3 A list of all the interesting places along the line

It's high time I post a list of all the interesting places on the Oskaloosa to Albia line of the M&StL. I'll use the mileposts as markers. Mileposts were calculated with St. Paul Union Depot as the 0 milepost. Most places are so large and / or diverse that I've subdivided them for better presentation of information.

1 MP 301.1 Oskaloosa
  - 1a Depot and trackage to North Yard including freight customers north of depot but excluding North Yard itself (with enginehouse) and College area
  - 1b Freighthouse, team tracks and related freight customer tracks
  - 1c South Yard
  - 1d Wye including CRI&P and CBQ trackage below wye in cut
 - 1e 11th district to Monmouth and continuing on as 12th district Peoria, both in Illinois, including trackage to freight customers like Clow Valve and interchange with CRI&P
  - 1f ex CBQ trackage taken over in 1934
  - 1g CRI&P trackage

2 MP 302.6 Tracy Junction, since washout of the bridge over the des Moines River at Tracy in 1947: Fosterdale Junction
  - 2a Tracy Junction area but excluding the Beacon area
  - 2b Fosterdale Rutherford coal washer and possibly coal mines nearby
  - 2c Rochester
  - 2d Tracy bridge over Des Moines river and sand and gravel companies
  - 2e Tracy crossing of Wabash RR and Tracy CBQ yard (shared with CBQ)

3 MP 303.2 Beacon
  - 3a Beacon M&StL
  - 3b Beacon CRI&P including spur to coal mines and junction of line to Oskaloosa and K&D mainline to Evansville and Des Moines right near trestle
  - 3c Beacon ex CBQ trestle across CRI&P and possibly coal mines

4 MP 304.9 Excelsior

5 MP 306.7 Givin
  - 5a Givin M&StL including tracks to coal mines east and south of CRI&P crossing
  - 5b Givin bridges over Muchakinnock Creek
  - 5c Givin CRI&P including spur to coal mine west of line

6 MP 311.2 Eddyville
  - 6a Eddyville CRI&P interchange and spur to sand and gravel company
  - 6b Eddyville M&StL depot including spur to sand and gravel company besides Des Moines river in town
  - 6c Eddyville Des Moines river bridge
  - 6d Eddyville CRI&P depot

MP 313 Bridgeport including ISU coal fired power plant but not Cargill (too late)

MP 315.9 Coalfield
  - 8a Coalfield station sign (depot?)
  - 8b Coalfield spur to coal mines
  - 8c Coalfield multiple bridges over Miller Creek

MP 318.8 Lockman
  - 9a Lockman junction to coal mines
  - 9b Lockman coal mines
  - 9c Lockman trestle

10 MP 319.4 Hickory
  - 10a Hickory station sign
  - 10b Hickory hill including big trestles over Miller Creek

11 MP 323.2 Maxon
    Interchange with CB&Q

12 MP 324.6 Albia
  - 12a Albia Depot & freighthouse (joint with Wabash)
  - 12b Albia yard, engine facilities, freight track
  - 12c crossing of Wabash, M&StL and interurban Iowa Southern Utillities (ISU) including facilities, if any, of the latter interurban

13 MP Rizerville
    Junction of line to 1 coal mine and line to Hocking parallel to Wabash and ISU, passing track

14 MP Hocking 
    Coal mines of subsidiary Hocking Coal Company

That's a long list of items to consider for a railroad in a small room and clearly not everything will make it onto the layout but not bad for a railroad line only 23.5 miles long, right? Also, not all places existed at the same time so there is that to consider.

It feels like I'm trying to fit a gallon (of 3,785 liters) of railroad in a liter of train room...